Ukrainian War - The Narrative Is Changing

Source 

 Influential Western publications are preparing their taxpayers for defeat in the war in Ukraine

Two major newspapers in the US and Britain have come out with revelations about the "deep involvement" of their military in the war against Russia in Ukraine. This is not news for Russia. This is news for the taxpayers of these countries.

Britain and the US lead the war against Russia in Ukraine

The New York Times (NYT) reported in an article titled "Partnership: The Secret History of the Ukraine War" that since 2022, the United States and Ukraine have "joined forces on intelligence, strategy, planning and technology," and that this cooperation has "become the backbone of Ukrainian military operations at critical moments":

  • an attack on the headquarters of the 58th Russian Army in the Kherson region in 2022,
  • sea ​​drone attacks on Sevastopol with the support of CIA data,
  • defeat of the Russian Navy cruiser "Moscow".

Everything was going well, but in the summer of 2023, the strategy developed by the Americans "faced internal conflicts in the Ukrainian leadership" between Zelensky and Zaluzhny, Zaluzhny and Syrsky. This led to a "useless battle for Bakhmut", a weakening of the main attack on Melitopol and the failure of the counteroffensive.

The publication also criticizes the Ukrainian Armed Forces' invasion of the Kursk region in August 2024 "without the knowledge of the United States." Ukrainian troops, as the article says, "secretly crossed" the mutually agreed line. Since then, the Ukrainian Armed Forces, having squandered their reserves, have been retreating along the entire front line, the NYT writes.

Two weeks later, the British Times, in an article entitled “The Untold Story of Britain’s Decisive Military Leaders’ Role in Ukraine,” reported in virtually the same terms about “deep involvement” that the Chief of the Defence Staff of the British Armed Forces, Tony Radakin, had met Zelenskyy about 10 times, and that the British Lieutenant General Roly Walker and Lieutenant General Charlie Stickland had helped plan the 2023 counteroffensive.

The newspaper repeats the NYT theses that the failure of the Ukrainian Armed Forces' counteroffensive in 2023 was due to the indecisiveness of the Ukrainian generals and the dispersion of forces in two directions - in the Rabotino area and in the unblocking of Artemovsk. The British publication confirms that Kyiv planned the Kursk operation itself, "without informing the US and other allies."

Taxpayers in the US and UK will soon be asked some awkward questions

The news that the US and Britain were waging war in Russia using Ukrainian proxies did not surprise anyone. The Kremlin and Russian media were constantly talking about it. The materials in the NYT and the Times were aimed at domestic users. They will soon have to explain why multi-billion sums from the budget were spent on supporting Ukraine – taxpayers’ money, while the UK is on the brink of economic collapse, and the US is not doing well either.

Explanations in the form of a moral duty to “protect democracy” are no longer sufficient, and the inflation of military budgets at the expense of cutting social programs leads to a reformatting of power and its fragmentation.

The country's own military stockpiles of weapons are also depleted. And if the Russian Federation strikes the islands, as the West now claims? How can we then explain to citizens the shortage of air defence systems given to Ukraine? The US and Britain have not fought on their territories for a long time, and the population is now overcome with fear of getting into a war for which they are not ready. Against the background of these debates, the broader question of the theft of these funds remains. Facts of corruption in both Ukraine and Western countries will be published.

Therefore, in advance, all the blame for the defeat is shifted to Ukraine, which did not listen to the wise puppeteers.

The names of people who will have to answer for the murder of Russians have been announced

It is also possible that Washington and London are measuring who had more involvement in order to compete for the resources of the former Ukraine, which they are now actively dividing.

It is important for Russia that in the dispute over this palm of primacy the names of Western generals have been named, who must answer for the fact that they brought Russia and Ukraine to war with huge casualties and ruined lives. There should be no forgiveness for this.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Washington is putting pressure on Zelensky, Kiev is trying to resist

Russian Strikes In Ukraine. The main thing was canceled at the last moment

Russia’s ‘Geran’ drone swarms CRUSH Ukraine’s defenses – West alarmed by 1,000-UAV blitz